Last week, we conducted a poll to gauge the importance of magnetic wireless charging among our readers. The results indicate that most respondents do not consider it a crucial feature, viewing it as a minor addition rather than an essential one.
The reasoning is straightforward. With the global shift towards USB-C for charging, users often prefer to rely on cables. Wired charging offers faster and more efficient power delivery compared to wireless options.
Interestingly, many who reported using only wired charging also mentioned they do not require mid-day top-ups. Modern smartphones typically come equipped with large batteries that are capable of sustaining a full day of heavy use.
Another key point is that the universal wired charging standard, USB-PD, significantly outperforms the universal wireless charging standard, which is capped at 25W for Qi2. These larger battery capacities benefit greatly from quicker charging solutions. While proprietary wireless systems can exceed 25W, they often complicate cross-brand compatibility.
Approximately one-third of voters expressed interest in magnetic technology but are divided in their preferences. Some users prefer built-in magnets for models they wish to use without a case, while others prioritize magnets in cases, believing they are less effective than those integrated into the phone itself.
Additionally, as mentioned in last week's poll article, magnets serve purposes beyond charging; 10% of voters are primarily interested in their application for magnetic mounts and accessories, with a preference for wired charging methods.
Although MagSafe-style chargers and mounts may not be universally popular, they have a role in the future of tech. Adoption has been slow outside of Apple, with Google being the first Android manufacturer to embrace this with Pixelsnap. Other Android brands have been hesitant to follow suit.
