AT&T recently attempted to use a regulatory watchdog's rulings against T-Mobile in an advertising campaign, only to have the same watchdog order AT&T to cease their ads for violating the rules. The National Advertising Division (NAD) explicitly stated that AT&T's use of their findings for promotional purposes was a direct violation of their agreement. This development has put AT&T in an awkward position as they face public scrutiny for their actions.
Despite the NAD's directive to pull the ads, AT&T has not yet complied with the order, leaving the campaign in limbo. This move has not only backfired on AT&T but has also raised questions about the integrity of the self-regulatory ad industry.
By attempting to leverage the NAD's decisions against T-Mobile, AT&T has inadvertently given their competitor an advantage and tarnished their own reputation in the process. This situation serves as a cautionary tale about the risks of exploiting regulatory bodies for competitive gain.